Berlin, Germany.
The dress rehearsal of the laser show tonight
Although the building has courted controversy and criticism (English Heritage has said the Shard "taints" a view of St Paul's), it is well-received as an elegant addition to the city's landmarks. Tonight sees the inauguration of the building, complete with a dazzling opening ceremony featuring laserbeams.
related stories on msn
My son is a construction manager on the shard, he was also on the Heron building over the river, both projects employed thousands and will do for many years to come.
Are you listening ( Cameron and Osbourne ) Hiccup and Heartburn i call them.
This is what the building injdustry needs, huge jobs employing thousands on long term contracts.
Stop talking and start asking for the tenders to rebuid Britain and get people in meaningful jobs.
It really is a shame that so many people on this forum seem to be unable either to spell correctly, or to use the spell checker, yet they still commit their rants to the web.
The aerial rat that we see flying around is a PIGEON, NOT a PIDGEON, the moans we hear are people WHINING, not WHYNING, Dubai is spelt just like that.
Finally the money that Qatar paid (not payed) was over £1billion and we have not paid anything towards it, the owners pay to clean it up.
Well, the metres mean absolutely nothing to me, because there are much taller structures.
However, this is design at its finest. As far as the aesthetics are concerned, I haven't come across another building to rival it. It simply is riveting and captivating.
It truly is artistic. What we're tired of are concrete blocks. This one, though, isn't just another block of concrete, instead it has a shape that incorporates angles, lines, and curves in interesting detail and in perfect artistic harmony. It also seems as if some of the sides wrap around the others. All of this makes it a rather varied and interesting structure, yet not baroque or garrish at all - it actually is sublime.
The mettalic glass, again, is an alluring finishing touch to it. It wouldn't have had the same impact without it.
As far as the height is concerned, you just need to be able to see across the city, which I'm sure one can easily do from it.
The lasers might be interesting for some time, unless all the buildings start using them and render their novelty into banality through abuse or else finally clutter the sky.
Most tourist have seen the old architecture. Besides, everybody wants variety. There is nothing wrong with dedicating an undeveloped or underdeveoped area to modern artistic/aesthetic buildings.
The cost at 450 million also isn't quite exorbitant or prohibitive.
Overall, it is a rather sublime addition to a city that might otherwise begin appearing a little rusty and not varied or modern to most.
More on msn Travel


See our pick of the best gardens in England, Wales and Scotland.

French artist Romain Jacquet-Lagreze has captured Hong Kong's famous skyscrapers from the ground floor.

We talk to the adventurer about his new Australia show and whether it is just "a patch of Blighty on the other side of the world".

Whether you're heading there for the film festival or a weekend break, you'll be spoilt for choice.

Take a look at some of the furry and scaly contenders for the photo contest

In pictures: visit the island where planes fly ridiculously low

A new book captures some of our favourite memories and experiences of holidaying at home.

The experts at i-escape share their pick of the world's best art deco hotels

The experts at Lonely Planet chose the top things to do in Cannes.

Reading this may trigger a face-palm moment as the FCO releases its annual list.

Be prepared for a lot of pink...















